Former Fort Bragg Army JAG
Fort Bragg Military Defense Lawyer
Blake Kamoroff served at Fort Bragg during the first three years of his military-law career. He led a busy legal-assistance office and then spent 25 months as a trial counsel, including work on prosecutions and administrative boards involving the 82nd Airborne Division and XVIII Airborne Corps.
The direct answer
Personal Fort Bragg experience at the start of a military-justice career.
Mr. Kamoroff did not learn Fort Bragg from a location page. He began his military-law career there, first helping Soldiers and Officers solve a wide range of legal problems and then prosecuting cases and handling boards in one of the Army’s busiest operational communities.
Fort Bragg service
From early intervention to prosecution and administrative boards.
- Legal-assistance leadershipMr. Kamoroff ran a busy legal-assistance office that helped Fort Bragg Soldiers and Officers with GOMORs, investigations, evaluation appeals, financial-liability investigations of property loss (FLIPLs), and many other legal problems.
- Trial counselHe then served 25 months as a military prosecutor. That assignment gave him direct experience evaluating evidence, advising commanders, developing cases, and understanding how government legal teams prepare military-justice and administrative actions.
- 82nd Airborne Division and XVIII Airborne Corps mattersHis work was not limited to the units under his assigned command. He also handled prosecutions and boards involving the 82nd Airborne Division and XVIII Airborne Corps.
- Current defense practiceThat early Fort Bragg experience now informs his civilian defense work: identify the real decision-maker, understand how the record is being built, and respond before an allegation becomes a lasting career document.
Why prosecution experience matters
Defense is stronger when counsel understands how the government builds the case.
A trial counsel sees how allegations become investigations, how witness accounts are tested, how commanders receive legal advice, and how a disciplinary decision can become the foundation for later adverse action. That perspective can help identify missing evidence, unsupported assumptions, and downstream career risk.
It does not guarantee a result or create special influence. It helps shape a disciplined defense strategy grounded in the evidence and the military decision process.
Current name reference: the Army restored the name Fort Bragg in 2025. This page uses the installation’s current official name.
Current matters may include
- GOMOR and LOR rebuttals
- Article 15 and NJP decisions
- CID and command investigations
- Referred OER and NCOER responses
- Relief-for-cause and evaluation disputes
- FLIPL and financial-liability matters
- Separation and officer-elimination risk
Representation today
Military defense for Fort Bragg Soldiers and Officers.
Many administrative and investigative matters can be handled through secure document exchange, phone or video meetings, witness development, and written advocacy. If the matter requires travel, a hearing, or another in-person appearance, that need and the scope of representation should be addressed directly.
Facing a Fort Bragg deadline?
Send the action, your suspense date, and a short summary. If the deadline is within 72 hours, call instead of relying only on the form.
Request a Free ConsultationFort Bragg FAQ
Questions about Blake Kamoroff’s Fort Bragg experience
Did Blake Kamoroff serve at Fort Bragg?
Yes. He served at Fort Bragg during the first three years of his military-law career, first leading a busy legal-assistance office and then serving 25 months as a trial counsel.
What legal work did he perform at Fort Bragg?
His work included legal assistance for Soldiers and Officers facing GOMORs, investigations, evaluation appeals, FLIPLs, and other legal problems, followed by prosecutions and administrative boards as a trial counsel.
Did he work with the 82nd Airborne Division and XVIII Airborne Corps?
Yes. In addition to matters for his assigned command, he worked on prosecutions and boards involving the 82nd Airborne Division and XVIII Airborne Corps.
Can he represent servicemembers currently assigned to Fort Bragg?
Yes, depending on the type of matter and the agreed scope. Many administrative, investigative, and written-response matters can be handled remotely, while other matters may require travel or a separate appearance agreement.
Does prior Fort Bragg service mean the firm is affiliated with the Army?
No. Kamoroff Law, LLC is a private civilian law firm and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by Fort Bragg, the Department of the Army, or the Department of Defense.
Review before you respond
Need focused legal judgment before deciding what to do next?
An Urgent Military Case Assessment is a paid limited-scope review for servicemembers who already have paperwork, evidence, or a short suspense and need a practical assessment of risks, options, and recommended next steps.
More than a consultation. Less than full representation.
The assessment does not include drafting, command contact, law-enforcement contact, negotiation, appearance, submission of materials, or follow-on representation unless separately agreed in writing.
Learn About Urgent Case AssessmentFree Consultation
Do not let a Fort Bragg action become a permanent record by default.
Early review creates time to test the evidence, identify the real career risk, and build a response for the decision that matters.