Military investigation lawyer

Military Investigation Lawyer Before You Make a Statement

Get advice before an interview, written statement, phone search, command inquiry, or AR 15-6 response turns uncertainty into permanent evidence.

Early interventionBefore interviews, statements, or consent
Investigation typesCID, MP, command, and AR 15-6 matters
Entry pricingInvestigation-stage representation generally starts at $1,000

Quick answer: When CID, MPs, command investigators, or an investigating officer requests information, the first priority is to understand your rights, preserve evidence, and avoid creating statements or digital evidence that make the case harder to defend.

The decisions that matter

Use the response to solve the actual problem in front of the command.

Protect rights

Evaluate questioning, rights advisements, consent requests, device access, and written-statement demands before responding.

Preserve evidence

Secure messages, timelines, documents, and witness information without altering or destroying potential evidence.

Anticipate command action

Treat the investigation as potential groundwork for a GOMOR, Article 15, evaluation, separation, or court-martial theory.

Experience behind the strategy

Former government and defense experience, applied directly to the early record.

Blake Kamoroff is a former Army JAG, prosecutor, defense counsel, and Senior Defense Counsel. His board and court-martial experience helps identify how early statements and administrative findings may be used later.

120+Separation and officer-elimination boards
Approx. 200Court-martial cases, including 50+ trials
DirectAttorney access after representation begins
WorldwideRemote representation for appropriate matters

Client-reported investigation outcome

Published client review

No adverse findings after a disciplined AR 15-6 response

A client reported learning to answer clearly without over-talking and that the investigating officer made no adverse findings after the response was prepared.

This description summarizes a published client review. Prior results do not guarantee future outcomes; every matter depends on its own facts, evidence, command posture, deadline, and applicable law.

This service may fit when:

  • CID, MPs, a command investigator, or an investigating officer contacted you.
  • Someone requested an interview, written statement, device access, or consent.
  • An investigation may lead to administrative or disciplinary action.

Representation may include:

  • Rights and interview strategy
  • Command and law-enforcement contact analysis
  • Evidence and timeline review
  • Preparation for appropriate statements or responses
  • Assessment of GOMOR, Article 15, separation, and court-martial risk

Practical questions

Answers before you respond.

What should I say if investigators want to question me?

You may have important rights, including the right to remain silent and request counsel. Get case-specific advice and stop discussing the allegations after invoking rights.

Should I give investigators my phone passcode?

Do not provide passcodes, unlock devices, or consent to searches without legal advice about the request and your rights.

Can my command order a written statement?

Rights issues can arise when a statement may be self-incriminating. Obtain legal advice before writing or signing a statement about suspected misconduct.

Can an investigation lead to a GOMOR or Article 15?

Yes. Investigation findings and statements frequently become the basis for GOMORs, Article 15s, evaluations, separation, or officer elimination.

Free consultation

Get advice before fear, guessing, or an unnecessary statement controls the record.

Send the type of action, the deadline, and a short description. If the suspense is within 72 hours, call instead of relying only on the form.

Talk to a Military Defense Attorney

Request a ConsultationCall 1-86-MILITARY
Call 1-86-MILITARYFree Consultation
Tap to Call Free Consultation